Category — Posts

The Bureau of Labor Statistics dropped some terrible news on the people of Connecticut and Governor Ned Lamont on Friday. The state’s economy contracted by 4.7% in the second quarter of the year. It was the second worst state decline. Only energy market-dependent Wyoming had a bigger fall at 4.8%.The national economy declined by 0.6%, according to the report featured in the Hartford Business Journal.

Connecticut was last in personal income growth at 2.2%, the Connecticut Business and Industry Association pointed out Friday. CBIA calls the figure “a key economic indicator of economic competitiveness.” It said the two statistics highlight “the fragile nature of the state’s recovery and growth prospects.”

The double-barreled bad news comes as Lamont, a Democrat seeking a second term. seeks to portray the state on a dramatic upswing after eight years under his surly predecessor, Dannel P. Malloy.

The chilly dose of reality may force Lamont to give a rest to his happy talk campaign and drives a hole through his upbeat narrative. The Democrat may need to shift his odd fixation on the state having the best pizza to explaining the failure of the state’s economy to continue to lag far behind the rest of the nation–and the region–in economic growth. The Greenwich aristocrat has one streak of unbroken luck: He faces Republican Bob Stefanowski on November 8th, a rematch of their 2018 contest. Saudi Bob has been mired in cultural issues, a choice he appears to have made as his campaign falls further behind Lamont in public and private polls.

Stefanowski has put at least $10 million into his campaign, a he pledged to do when he launched it early this year. He may have added more since his summer campaign finance report. The payday lender executive who appears to have had a lucrative second career in the Desert Kingdom as a consultant to senior managers made more than $36 million between 2019 and 2021. He may find that fortune is not as big as it looks when confronted with the fourth generation wealth amassed by Governor and Mrs. Lamont, who have spent more than $50 million in four statewide campaigns, including this year’s, since 2006.

Published September 30, 2022.

Trustees of the University of Connecticut are expected to announce their choice of a new president on Wednesday. Interim President Redenka Maric, sources tell Daily Ructions, has emerged as the frontrunner for the top public position at the state’s premier public university.

The choice of Maric will signal the weakness of the board and the continuing influence of UConn’s top administrators. A Maric presidency will confirm the sclerotic preferences of the board and their bureaucratic overlords. A new president from outside UConn would bring a new team and change. Power would devolve from the people who have made many errors to new ones who may usher in a new era of accountability. Preventing that new era is the chief goal of insiders manipulating the search. An outsider might require the administration to adhere to the state’s hiring practices.

Only a late intervention by Governor Ned Lamont could save UConn from a serious mistake by championing opportunity and renewal over the celebration of connivance and cementing family members of the influential into the extended UConn ecosystem. Lamont, a Harvard and Yale graduate, has shown little interest in the state of public higher education.

Published September 27, 2022.

Republican nominee for governor Bob Stefanowski appears to have a one-person company registered to operate in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, as records indicate it is, Daily Ructions can report. Stefanowski says contracts preclude him from discussing his clients.

Stefanowski has a Connecticut entity registered as Lolo Consulting, LLC, with the Secretary of the State. The other Lolo is a ”one-person foreign entity” registered in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and described as “providing senior management consulting services,” according to a commercial registration filed in Riyadh, the Saudi capital.

Reached by phone Monday night, Stefanowski, who has loaned his campaign $10 million, refused to say if he does or does not do business in Saudi Arabia. The Madison Republican said he enters into non-disclosure agreements with clients as to their names and locations. If the former payday lender executive has not been doing business in Saudi Arabia ”providing senior management consulting services” there would be no non-disclosure provisions in contracts that do not exist. There is no penalty for denying a contract you do not have.

Stefanowski disclosed in an early September summary earning $36.8 million in 2019, 2020 and 2021. Stefanowski on Monday accused his Democratic opponent in their rematch this year, Governor Ned Lamont, of filing his income tax return separately from Ann Huntress Lamont, the governor’s highflying venture capitalist spouse.

Saudi Arabia has been widely condemned for its brutal and continuing human rights abuses, including the execution of 81 people in one day in March. Stefanowski is unlikely to have mentioned human rights abuses in Saudi Arabia.

The Lolo registration to conduct business in Saudi Arabia was filed in February 2020 and expires in June 2023.

Stefanowski and Lamont on Tuesday will have the first of just two general election debates. it will be streamed live on NBC Connecticut at 12:30 p.m. and broadcast at 7 p.m.

Published September 26, 2022.

Days of Awe indeed. They know how to send it over the footlights to welcome 5783.

Published September 25, 2022.

Democrat Christine Maine ended her appearance on a local radio debate Friday with a startling analysis. Asked by WINY moderator John Mahan posed the innocuous question from a listener: How can police recruit more officers? Maine, her party’s candidate in the 51st House District, shared her experience as a magistrate in Newport News, Virginia.

Maine said her job brought her into contact with thousands of officers presenting her with search and arrest warrants. Maine told Quiet Corner listeners she was “shocked” when she learned ”some of them joined because they wanted to beat people up with impunity, they wanted to have sex because the uniform attracted women and they wanted to speed.”

Maine concluded her answer by observing that current testing methods of new recruits do not keep out the psychopaths. We need, according to Maine, fewer combative and more friendly officers.

Maine faces two-term incumbent Republican Rick Hayes for the Killingly, Putnam and Thompson seat. Hayes, a retired Putnam police chief was nonplussed when given the opportunity to respond and close the hourlong debate.

Maine is no fringe candidate. She qualified for public financing of her campaign with contributions from public safety committee co-chairs Senator Cathy Osten and Representative Maria Horn, as well as Democratic senators Saud Anwar, Richard Lopes and Norman Needleman. Maine also received a contribution from former Secretary of the State Denise Merrill. Alex Kasser, former state senator from Greenwich, contributed $100. Kasser describes herself in the Maine campaign finance report as an unemployed lawyer living in New Milford.

Lt. Governor Susan Bysiewicz joined Maine at a local Democratic even in Killingly last week.

Published September 25, 2022.

It seems crude by today’s standards, but no one had delivered a speech like it before 1952. Mr. Nixon knew how to modulate, divert and attack. He was also a master of posing a question and then answering it to his advantage.

Nixon sounds defiant notes throughout the speech, but he wavered in the days before he delivered it. Pat Nixon bucked up her husband’s fighting spiriting by reminding him of the consequences of quitting the ticket and slinking away.

Nixon had been in politics for just six years when Dwight Eisenhower picked him as his running mate. When he finished, Nixon thought the speech was a failure. “Nixon soon learned that he was wrong,” according to biography John A. Farrell. “He learned it from the teary eyes of the cameraman on the set, and the awe in the voice of the who wiped away his makeup. He learned it from the cheers of the loyalists on the sidewalk, from an adoring crowd that now filled his hotel lobby, and reports of swamped switchboards and overwhelmed telegraph lines all over the country.” The speech attracted the largest television audience to that time.

The response to the Checkers speech caused Nixon to conclude he had mastered the medium. Eight years later, television would be his undoing when he hobbled into a television studio to face John F. Kennedy.

Published September 23, 2022.

Their embarrassment is showing. Governor Ned Lamont’s campaign announced late Friday afternoon that ”it will participate in two debates and four candidate forums ahead of the November 8th election.”

The Greenwich Democrat’s Friday taking out the trash was his declaration that he deigns to grace with his presence a September 27th debate on WVIT and a second on WTNH on November 1st. “These are the only debates in which Governor Lamont will be participating” the campaign declared with a tone that suggests the decision does not comport with Lamont’s often-stated desire to encourage participatory democracy. Lamont has declined several other invitations to participate in televised debates, including from News12 Connecticut.

Debating has never been Lamont’s strength, though after four years as governor he ought to have more confidence in himself as he appeals to voters to show their confidence in him as he seeks a second term. The two debate dates have been agreed to with an eye on containing Lamont’s habit of leaving wreckage when he wanders off-script. Blunders at the end of September can be sealed over with media buys paid for from the fourth generation American aristocrat’s fortune. Gaffes on November 1st will leave little time for Lamont’s opponent to amplify and exploit them.

Republican Bob Stefanowski, not a nimble debater himself, has long been looking forward to a series of televised rematches with the winner of the 2018 race for governor. Lamont’s refusal to engage in October will require his loanshark mogul rival to deliver a knockout before cameras in 11 days.

Lamont has ducked debates before, and it cost him. In his 2010 primary challenge of party-endorsed candidate Dannel P. Malloy, Lamont, relying on the power of his wealth to see him through, avoided debating Malloy. The former Stamford mayor mocked and berated Lamont for hiding from traditional public discourse. Malloy, who polls showed was the underdog through the primary campaign, defeated Lamont in a landslide. Malloy’s reliance on disdain may have been spurred by his fury over Lamont sending a camera crew to film from the bushes at Malloy’s home.

If Stefanowski is to have any chance at defeating Lamont, he’ll need spend the next 11 days preparing for what may be his only meaningful encounter with the curiously timid Lamont.

Published September 16, 2022.

Politico reports Senate Republicans are taking their top candidates on a two-day Florida fundraising tour. Republicans have been put on the back foot by hefty Democratic hauls. The Republicans will appear at events in Naples, Palm Beach and Miami, according to Politico. They expect to raise $3.5 million to be divided among candidates and a party committee.

The candidates selected by the National Republican Senatorial Committee are Adam Laxalt (Nevada), J.D. Vance (Ohio), Mehmet Oz (Pennsylvania), Ted Budd (North Carolina), Joe O’Dea (Colorado), Tiffany Smiley (Washington) and incumbents Marco Rubio (Florida) and Chuck Grassley (Iowa).

Connecticut Republican Senate nominee Leora Levy is not included. Levy told party activists that her national fundraising connections, enhanced by her seat on the Republican National Committee, would provide plenty of money for her campaign to defeat Incumbent Democrat Richard Blumenthal.

On Wednesday, Levy highlighted a prediction from fellow Trump loyalist and Greenwich Republican Larry Kudlow predicting she will be the surprise winner of the nation’s Senate campaigns.

Published September 15, 2022.

U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal holds a wide lead over Republican Leora Levy in a WTNH/The Hill/Emerson College poll of 1,000 likely voters in his bid for a third term. Levy trails the Democrat by 13%, 48.8% to 36.1%.

Levy appears to have brought no momentum from her August primary win into the general election campaign. The Greenwich Republican received a boost with an endorsement from Donald Trump shortly before the August 9th primary. Levy won 134 of the state’s 169 towns against Themis Klarides and Peter Lumaj. Levy, who serves on the Republican National Committee, has continued to emphasize the dark vision of life in the United States that was an integral element of her appeal to primary voters.

Blumenthal, a familiar figure after more than 30 years in statewide office, 20 as attorney general, has paid scant attention to Levy. With $8 million on hand in August, the Greenwich Democrat was prepared to meet any post-primary surge by Levy, who is partially funding her campaign.

Published September 14, 2022.

In the run-up to the 2018 election, Democrat Alexandra Kasser–then known as Bergstein–denied during a local radio program that a crime had been committed at her tony Greenwich home. Caller Felicia asked Kasser, running for the state Senate from the Greenwich-based district, how she justified her women’s rights credentials when she had “covered up a sexual assault in your own home.”

Felicia was able to pose the essence of her question before being cut off. The host asked Kasser what the caller was talking about. “I have no idea,” Kasser offered as her first response. She expanded her answer, revealing she did have an idea. “I’ll tell you what that is. That is an unfounded rumor that has been circulating and there is no basis whatsoever in it. I can only imagine what the source is.”

“We don’t like ugly rumors on the Lisa Wexler Show. We only like true rumors,” the host added. Wexler may have been an unwitting witness to a true rumor, it now appears.

In 2019, Kasser declared war on privilege and the patriarchy. The battleground seems not to have included what may have happened to a young woman at Kasser’s home–until weeks before Kasser’s divorce trial begins.

Four years after she won and a year after she resigned her seat, Kasser now thinks there is something to the story of a 2014 sexual assault at her home. On September 1st, seven weeks before the trial in her contentious and high stakes divorce action against husband Seth Bergstein begins, Kasser wants any evidence he may possess of what happened at their marital home in Greenwich in October 2014–and what may have flowed from it.

In a court filing, Kasser seeks from Bergstein, “Copies of all correspondence, payments or other proof of involvement Defendant [Seth Bergstein] had in managing or suppressing a potential criminal investigation involving an incident that may have occurred at 18 Flower Lane, Greenwich in October 2014; including but not limited to all communications, by text or email, with Brunswick School, any parent of a Brunswick student, any parent of a Greenwich High School (GHS) student, any GHS resource officer, any Greenwich police officer or any attorney of other person with whom Defendant may have spoken to delay an investigation or cover up of an incident.”

Seth Bergstein responded in a September 7th court filing that he “did not manage or suppress a potential criminal investigation.” He further claims “the request is overly broad, unduly burdensome, intended to annoy and/or harass the defendant, and cannot be provided by the defendant with substantially greater facility than could otherwise be obtained by the plaintiff.” Bergstein also objects to the request because it “calls for information protected by the attorney-client privilege.”

If there was no incident in October 2014, it is difficult to see how Kasser’s request violates Bergstein’s attorney-client privilege.

In a 2018 case filed in federal court, Paula Scanlan v. Town of Greenwich, (the case was originally initiated as Jane Doe v. Town of Greenwich) the plaintiff Scanlan claimed the Greenwich police violated her civil rights by not properly investigating her complaint of a 2016 sexual assault. In a memorandum in opposition to Greenwich’s summary judgment motion Scanlan alleged “a years-long pattern of the Greenwich Police Department (“GPD”) to apply a less rigorous approach to investigations of criminal activity alleged against students of Brunswick School (“Brunswick”). Brunswick employed a back channel of communications with GPD designed to allow the school and its headmaster to intervene immediately in any case of possible criminal charges with the intent of dissuading victims from pursuing criminal charges and influencing witnesses to provide statements to the police that followed alternate narratives to avoid the potential for prosecution.”

The memorandum refers to an October 2014 alleged assault as evidence of a pattern by Greenwich police. Without revealing the location of the alleged incident or any names of parties who may have been involved, Scanlan’s memorandum claims, “On October 6, 2014, Greenwich Country Day School (“GCDS”) Security Director Mike Reynolds contacted the Greenwich Police Department (“GPD”) to report that the school had received a video of an apparent sexual assault of an unconscious teenage girl by a boy that was observed and video recorded by other teenage boys (“First Sexual Assault Video”). The video came with a text message from an anonymous source and showed ‘a juvenile male [who] appeared to be digitally penetrating [the girl’s] vagina under her shorts.’ The text message stated that a ‘[Brunswick boy] fingered [a Greenwich Academy girl] on the couch in front of everyone. . . . [the Greenwich Academy girl] is passed out and that’s rape.’” (Defs. Ex. 35 at TOG 1034). The video was one of two recordings of the sexual assault made by the boys, which were circulating widely among the high school students. One of the videos was recorded by a Brunswick School (“Brunswick”) student and the other was recorded by a GCDS student. (Defs. Ex. 35 at TOG 1040; Pl. Ex. FF at WICK 866).”

“Two days after GPD received the criminal complaint, on the morning of October 8, 2014, [Brunswick Headmaster Tom] Philip notified by email the school’s Upper School Faculty about the sexual assault investigation. In that email, Philip explained that ‘an impromptu gathering [was] held at the home of a Freshman boy’ during which ‘alcohol made its way into the gathering and in a somewhat circuitous way, [and] the party has gained the attention of the Greenwich Police.’ There was no mention of an unconscious girl being digitally manipulated by a Brunswick boy, with the assault being video recorded and the recordings being widely distributed by two other boys, one of whom was a Brunswick student. Philip had in that short time begun to construct a new narrative about the sexual assault that took place at that ‘impromptu gathering’ – that it was merely a case of underage drinking. (Pl. Ex. FF at WICK 864).” 

The fall of 2014 was a busy time for Greenwich police and young locals. According to Scanlan’s memorandum, “the mother of a female Greenwich High School student raised an alarm to GPD about two incidents involving Brunswick students. The mother, who is a medical doctor (“Dr. X”), picked up her daughter from a party held at the home of a Brunswick student (“F”). The father of the Brunswick student (“Father F”) walked her daughter out to the car and directed her into the back seat. He said nothing about the girl’s condition or about why he needed to walk her to the car. Dr. X watched her daughter with alarm because she was unable to walk by herself and was stumbling. When she got into the car she reeked of vomit, was very disheveled, and obviously drunk. The girl’s sweatshirt was on inside out and had vomit across the entire front. (Pl. Ex. W at 7:22-24, 8:1-5, 9:10-18, 12:6-14, 20:8-12, 21:4-25, 22:1-25). Dr. X was so alarmed by her daughter’s condition that she later made a complaint to GPD’s anonymous tip line about the underage drinking that occurred that night, as well as the fact that the parents were aware of the drinking as evidenced by the father’s lack of concern when he walked her daughter to the car. Dr. X provided the address of the residence and told them that the parents had to have known about the drinking because the father clearly knew her daughter was drunk when he walked her to the car. Dr. X was also upset by the fact that Father F was so nonchalant about her daughter’s condition, as if it were no big deal. (Pl. Ex. W at 31:9-21, 42:6-25, 43:1-8). 

“GPD personnel testified that for all complaints received, an investigation file should be opened even if it is found to be without merit. (Pl. Ex. JJJ at 86:3-24; Pl. Ex. R at 66:18-67:12). In contravention of this policy and practice, there is no evidence that any investigation was conducted in response to this complaint by Dr. X. (Pl. Ex. W at 31:6-8, Pl. Ex. Q at 214:17-25). 

“In addition to finding her daughter incoherent and disheveled, Dr. X made another alarming discovery on the night of the party. Since her daughter was too inebriated to answer her mother’s questions about what happened at the party, Dr. X took her daughter’s cell phone to see if there was anything she could find out. She found a group text with a video that showed ‘a girl who was completely naked. You could not see her face and she was laying face down with her head in the distance. And there were a group of boys on the side. One of them was digitally manipulating her. And she was obviously unconscious because she wasn’t moving when this was happening. And the boys were all laughing. . . .’ (Pl. Ex. W at 23:10-25, 24:1-6). The video (the “Second Sexual Assault Video”) Dr. X described was very different from the video confiscated in the First Sexual Assault Video investigation. In the First Sexual Assault Video, the girl was clothed; in this video she was ‘completely naked.’ In the First Sexual Assault Video, the girl’s face was visible; in this video, she was face down with her head in the distance. Capt. Zuccerella saw the First Sexual Assault Video and testified that it was different from the description of the Second Sexual Assault Video. (Pl. Ex. Q at 228:5-25, 229:1-4, 234:21-25, 235:1).” 

The two alleged incidents were followed by an unusual announcement by the GPD. According to Scanlan’s memorandum, “GPD provided information about the First Sexual Assault Video investigation to the press. (Defs. Ex. 41). In a November 13, 2014 article in the Greenwich Time, then Lt. Kraig Gray,5 GPD Public Information Officer, was quoted as saying ‘[t]he Greenwich Police Department does not generally comment on rumors, . . . but based upon the level of misinformation and confusion, we can say that we chased down two allegations that turned out to be unfounded.’ (Defs. Ex. 41 at 3) (emphasis added). In fact, in addition to being a departure from normal practice, the statements made to the press by GPD were entirely false. (Pl. Ex. Q at 208:8-25, 209:1-25; 210:1-20, 214:17-25). Lt. Gray is reported as saying that GPD ‘investigated at that time and determined the allegations were unfounded.’ The article further states that ‘[p]olice interviewed multiple students, parents and administrators, and determined that no crime had been committed.’ (Defs. Ex. 41 at 1). In fact, the First Sexual Assault Video case/incident reports established beyond refute that the allegations were true and that charges were not filed only at the request of the parents of the victim, not because no crimes had been committed. (Defs. Ex. 35). Further, neither the victim nor the attacker, nor the videographers were interviewed. (Defs. Ex. 35). 

“The Greenwich Time article also quotes from a November 12, 2014, letter from Brunswick Headmaster Tom Philip to the parents of students of Brunswick’s middle and high school. In that letter, Philip falsely stated that ‘Brunswick students . . . acknowledged that cell-phone images had been taken at various points’ but that none of the Brunswick students admitted to ‘participating in (or having knowledge of) any instance of sexual assault.’ (Pl. Ex. O at WICK 778). As the First Sexual Assault Video case/incident reports reveal, those statements are false because neither the Brunswick boy who digitally penetrated the victim, nor the Brunswick boy who video recorded the assault, denied they had done so to the police. (Defs. Ex. 35 at TOG 1041). 

“Philip’s letter goes on to describe that ‘[c]oncurrent to this inquiry, the school learned of yet another party, again involving students from multiple schools and of varying ages, at a private home, where alcohol was available.’ (Pl. Ex. O at WICK 778). The Greenwich Time article also refers to this second party, stating that ‘[t]he headmaster’s letter also made reference to a second party, which police addressed as well. . . . Shortly after their first investigation, department officials became aware of another alleged incident of assault at a high school party under similar circumstances. A similar investigation turned up the same result as the first one did, police said.’ (Defs. Ex. 41 at 2-3). This other party discussed by Headmaster Philip and Lt. Gray may have referred to the GPD anonymous tip line complaint filed by Dr. X about the party her daughter attended at F’s house, and it may have referred to the video recording that Dr. X. turned over to Lt. Keegan. However, there is no record of any second investigation, and no one at GPD can recall anything about this second party or investigation. (Defs. Ex. 36 at Interrogatory 2; Pl. Ex. Q at 214:17-25). However, since these statements given to the Greenwich Time are contemporaneous evidence of a second party and video, which is corroborated by the testimony of Dr. X, who had personal knowledge of both, a jury could conclude that Brunswick and GPD took steps to cover them up.”

Scanlan’s memorandum depicts one of the world’s wealthiest towns as a nest of connections that combine to protect the privileged from the consequences of their acts and deny their victims justice. The Bergstein divorce trial may inadvertently shine a light on a town where injustice can be accompanied by a hefty price tag. Scanlan is appealing in the Second Circuit the district court’s granting of defendant’s summary judgment motion in May.

Kasser would be remarkably incurious if only now has her interest been stirred in an alleged incident at her home. It would be willful ignorance for Kasser not to have known something about the alleged incident at her home that she dismissed as mere unfounded rumors. What Kasser might not have realized is that her 2018 emphatic public denial of an assault at her home would have been preserved—and is included above.

Published September 13, 2022. Updated on September 14, 2022.