Yale Graduate Students for Palestine (GSP) plans to commence a hunger strike if Yale University president Peter Salovey refuses or ignores the group’s demands that Yale divest its pension funds from arms manufacturers that do business with Israel. In a Tuesday night email to members of the press, GSP announced that 48 hours after an unsatisfactory or no response is received from Salovey, “around 12 members of the Graduate Students for Palestine will begin a hunger strike.”

According to the Yale Daily News, the dozen hunger strikers will be drawn from both undergraduate and graduate students.

The hunger strike is timed to “coincide with Bulldog Days, when prospective undergraduate students come to visit Yale,” according to GSP. The time and location of the hunger strike, the GSP message message concludes, “will hopefully bring even more attention to the strikers, and to the ongoing genocide being perpetrated by the Israeli military.”

Abraham Wyner, Professor of Statistics and Data Science at The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and Faculty Co-Director of the Wharton Sports Analytics and Business Initiative, casts considerable doubt on the frequently cited claims by the Hamas-controlled Gaza Health Ministry that 30,000 civilians have been killed during the six months of war. He writes, “The total civilian casualty count is likely to be extremely overstated. Israel estimates that at least 12,000 fighters have been killed. If that number proves to be even reasonably accurate, then the ratio of noncombatant casualties to combatants is remarkably low: at most 1.4 to 1 and perhaps as low as 1 to 1.”

Wyner explained his analysis on the April 10th episode of Dan Senor’s essential Call Me Back podcast.

American university campuses have seen an explosion of anti-Israeli and antisemitic protests against Israel’s right to defend itself since the October 7th Hamas attack on Israel that killed 1,200 people in southern Israel. Hamas continues to hold more than 100 hostages, though the number who have died while in captivity is uncertain.

A February hunger strike by 17 Brown University students also seeking a change in investment policies ended after eight days. More than 30 Harvard students went on a 12 hour fast to show their support for the Brown University students.

Published April 11, 2024.

Refusing to cooperate with US News in its gathering of information for law school rankings is paying off for the University of Connecticut School of Law. The law school moved from 2023’s dismal 64th spot to 55th this year out of 196.

Dean and Professor of Law Eboni S. Nelson wrote last year, “The decision not to participate derives from our long-held belief that the U.S. News rankings do not appropriately measure or adequately capture UConn Law’s strengths and values or the life-transformative education experience we offer our students.” If Nelson’s assessment was correct the improvement in UConn Law’s rank may reflect the survey not capturing the life-transformative education experience at other schools.

Published April 10, 2024.

Lieutenant Governor Susan Bysiewicz’s PAC raised $104,000 from donors in the first quarter of the year, according to its most recent campaign finance report. The Power of Women PAC was heavy on the $1,000 maximum donors. Donors ponying up $1,000 each accounted for $90,000 of the Bysiewicz’s haul.

The PAC serves as a staging areas for what would be Bysiewicz’s fourth campaign for governor should Ned Lamont decide not to seek a third term in 2026. Lamont, a prolific self-funder in his four statewide campaigns since 2006, has not donated to his partner in government’s PAC.

The committee’s $8,000 in expenses included contributions to Groton, Newington, and Rocky Hill Democratic town committees. The PAC also contributed $1,000 to Bethany for Governor, Delaware Democrat Bethany Hall-Long’s campaign committee.

The committee also made a $1,000 contribution to the Denise D’Ascenzo Foundation.

Bysiewicz has a complicated history with campaign financing. She was a loud critic of Ned Lamont spending a small portion of his big fortune on his 2018 campaign–until she joined Lamont as his running mate shortly before that year’s Democratic nominating convention. She will have little to say that is credible if 2026 sees a free spending candidate with his or her own fortune enter the 2026 race. The major political parties have nominated one or both self-funding candidates in the last four gubernatorial elections.

Published April 10, 2024.

State Representative Robyn Porter (D-New Haven) took a victory lap with an email to constituents that announced in its subject line, “Call Me Ma, Mom, Mommy or Mother.” Porter explained the memorable debate ignited by her modest proposal to add “expectant mother” to a bill before the Appropriations Committee.

The email is posted above. In its second paragraph, Porter expands on the debate that broke out over the meaning of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies. She writes, “…DEI should not come at the expense of EXCLUDING the foundation creation–our mothers. So, to be told that the term [pregnant persons] is inclusive is blatantly inaccurate.” During her two pregnancies, Porter continues, she identified “as an expectant mother, not a pregnant person.”

Such was the power of Porter’s argument last week that stories published in Connecticut were picked up, as she notes in the conclusion to her email, by the Daily Mail and the New York Post–two publications Democratic legislators rarely send their constituent to.

One day perhaps Porter will regale constituents with the debate in the Democratic caucus that preceded Thursday’s meeting. The air, according to at least one participant, was thick with sanctimony.

Published April 9, 2024.

Old Saybrook Republicans got a glimpse of the future Wednesday night at their Lincoln Day dinner. The Republican-leaning town was host to two ambitious Republicans, Heather Somers and Erin Stewart.

Somers was the Republican nominee for lieutenant governor in 2014. She and gubernatorial candidate Tom Foley lost to incumbent Democrats Dannel P. Malloy and popular Democrat Nancy Wyman. Somers, a former mayor of Groton, was elected to the state senate in 2016. She’s serving her fourth consecutive term in the shrinking Republican caucus.

Stewart was elected mayor of New Britain in 2013, defeating a Democratic incumbent. She has been re-elected to five consecutive two-year terms, at times showing significant coattails for the rest of the local Republican ticket. She ran for the Republican nominations for governor and lieutenant governor in 2018, placing second in the LG primary. Stewart sometimes was, sometimes was not a contender for the 2022 Republican nomination for lieutenant governor. Gubernatorial nominee Bob Stefanowski had some trouble making up his mind and settled on Fairfield Republican Laura Devlin.

Democrats eager to run for governor in 2026 have in varying degrees been discreet or indiscreet in their desire to shove aside popular two-term Governor Ned Lamont. Luke Bronin, the former mayor of Hartford, appears to have won full marks for observing the informal rules of civility and respect.

Republicans face different considerations. Lamont would be a formidable opponent if he sought a third term, perhaps winnowing the Republican field. For now, it’s a season to accept every invitation and to encourage some that were not offered.

A Stewart-Somers contest would showcase two candidates with different records and appeal. Stewart, as the chief executive of a city has compiled a list of achievements. Somers, in the minority for all but two years of her seven years in the legislature, has been able to do a lot of talking. Those make for very different platforms. If Somers can coral the support of her 11 senate colleagues, she will show her appeal reaches beyond southeastern Connecticut. If Stewart is able to apply some campaign discipline to her energy and reshuffles her circle of campaign advisers she will be the early frontrunner for her party’s nomination.

It has begun.

Published April 5, 2024.

A pitched battle in the culture wars broke out at the Legislative Office Building Thursday afternoon. The Appropriations Committee was considering House Bill 5454, An Act Concerning Mental Health Services for Young Children and Their Caregivers.

The purpose of the bill is “to maximize federal resources for mental health services for young children, their caregivers and pregnant persons.” Representative Robyn Porter (D-New Haven) offered an amendment to add “expectant mothers” to the bill. Porter explained she was offering the amendment to add equity and inclusion to women, like herself, who have a womb.

Representative Jillian Gilchrest (D-West Hartford) was first up for excluding expectant mothers, explaining to Porter, a Black woman, that pregnant persons is the inclusive term. This, Gilchrest concluded, is the way she and others hope we are moving in this country.

Other legislators offered their notions of who gives birth and what a mother is.

Committee co-chair Representative Toni Walker (D-New Haven) offered a typically sensible note when she said the bill is about mental health but why not add “expectant mothers”?

Gilchrest returned to the debate by seeming to suggest that adding “expectant mothers” would damage the mental health of LGBTQ+ people.

Much debate followed, mostly in support of adding “expectant mothers.” There was no suggestion that “pregnant persons” should not be included, only that “expectant mothers” should be excluded.

Senator Martha Marx (D-New London) suggested adding “pregnant fathers” to the bill. Expect Marx’s moment to garner extended attention.

Senator Saud Anwar (D-South Windsor) said it was important that the language of the bill not be changed. Adding “expectant mothers” would be counterproductive to what the bill seeks to accomplish. You shall not, it seemed, speak of mothers in H.B. 5454.

Gilchrest returned to the debate to claim adding mothers to the bill was beyond the jurisdiction of the committee. Gilchrist’s committee voted to refer the bill to appropriations.

After a huddle, presiding co-chair state Senator Cathy Osten (D-Sprague) ruled the amendment and then the bill would be voted on.

The committee voted 32-16 in favor of adding “expectant mothers” to the bill, a proposal that many may be surprised raised such determined opposition in one committee that includes more than 25% of the membership of the General Assembly.

Published April 4, 2024.

A quiet presidential primary day in Connecticut. Polls are open until 8 p.m. and voters will cast ballots at their regular polling place.

The state’s first presidential primary was held by the Democrats in 1976. Jimmy Carter edged out Morris Udall by 2,500 votes. With an endorsement by Ella Grasso, Senator Henry “Scoop” Jackson came in third with nearly 18% of the vote, 11 days after withdrawing from the race. Such was the power of Ella Grasso 48 years ago.

Published April 2, 2024.

Senator Chris Murphy’s (D-CT) happiness, loneliness and back-to-church stew of intrusive and showy sweeping statements came into focus throughout Easter, the day that puts the Christ into Christianity. Murphy proclaimed in a November 2023 Vanity Fair puff piece that he is not sure what he believes but he returned to attending church in the spring of last year.

One unshakable tenet of the senator who wants us off our phones and in church is a special Redemption exemption for fundraising text messages on the day of the Resurrection. Hey, Daily Ructions readers were surprised to receive pleas for campaign contributions through Christendom’s most important day.

Jesus Christ has risen today, can you chip in some money to my campaign? It had to be on Easter because this year fell on the last day of the first fundraising quarter of the year. And Murphy only had $8.2 million in the bank at the end of the last fundraising quarter. And no serious challenge is in sight.

“Over the past two years, Murphy’s joined not one, but two churches, one in Hartford and one in Washington, where his wife and kids live,” Politico reported, also in November. “He said he wants to meet people he wouldn’t normally connect with through work or his personal life.” Connecticut’s junior senator thinks his life in Washington, sometimes in Connecticut and even in the company of his authoritarian friends in Dubai, does not bring him into contact with people of faith. That betrays serious isolation, or Murphy could be incurious about others.

It’s only a hunch but some of those college basketball fans who enjoyed primo seats near Two-Churches at last weekend’s NCAA playoffs in Boston may regularly go to a church, temple or mosque. People of faith, Murphy may discover, are much like others. They probably don’t make a show of it in national publications, especially after six months of attending church after a long hiatus. The mystery of faith can be discovered in church—-often quietly.

Glory, glory, glory, somebody put the touch on me. It must have been the hand of our senator seeking re-election texting for dollars.

Murphy, 50, was filled with wonder at the power of faith in November as the two-term Democrat and Politico reporter Erin Schumacher happened to walk past the Wethersfield native’s Hartford church. “Churches are places that I think do a good job of speaking that language [of people connecting to each other],” he said. “That’s another way to feel less lonely.” You know, that way they talk in church.

Murphy was interested on Easter in speaking a strange language of the politically obsessed with fundraising texts and, for some, campaign ads. After all, the last day of the fundraising quarter needs to be the candidate’s triumphant holy day.

Won’t you pitch in?

Published April 1, 2024.

Published March 31, 2024–Easter.

Democratic state legislators are urging President Biden and the Connecticut congressional delegation to secure the release of Hamas terrorists held in Israel. In a letter circulated last week to be sent April 1st, the legislators, 9 House member and 3 members of the Senate, ask Biden and the state’s two senators and five representatives “to prioritize the safety and well-being of all hostages and detainees in both Gaza and Israel, recognizing their right to freedom and unconditional release.” Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) is estimated to have captured hundreds of Hamas fighters.

The legislators do not call for the release of hostages held by Hamas as a condition of a ceasefire.

In a chilling display of moral equivalency, the signers equate hostages kidnapped by Hamas on October 7th with the terrorists and their abettors captured by Israeli troops. There are no detainees in Gaza. There are only hostages, six of them are thought to be Americans. There are no hostages in Israel. There are detainees, the Hamas fighters and their accomplices held in Israel, no longer free to slaughter Jews. Releasing them would be a prelude to more violence.

More than 240 hostages were kidnapped and taken to Gaza in the October 7th attack on Israel that saw Hamas revel in its slaughter of 1,200 people. Hamas and other terrorist organizations are estimated to be holding 130 terrorists, though as many as 50 may be dead, according to Israeli estimates, The Wall Street Journal reported.

Curiously, Hamas is not named in the four-paragraph letter. It does, however, minimize the October 7th massacre of 1,200 people in southern Israel as merely connecting “to a history of conflict….” Because, that phrase suggests, October 7th was one more day in a continuum of strife. In January, Hamas described the attack as a “necessary step” against Israel. The Israeli government has vowed to destroy Hamas, a necessary step to peace and security in the region.

On March 25th, the United Nations Security Council passed a resolution calling for a ceasefire. The resolution does not make the release of the hostages held by Hamas a condition of a ceasefire, nor does it condemn Hamas. The United State, in an ill-judged decision, abstained on the resolution.

The dozen signatories loftily declare themselves as joining “with voices of conscience in Connecticut and around the world in recognizing the imperative need for an immediate, mutual, and permanent ceasefire in the assault on Gaza.” Their solution is the restoration of Hamas, allowing it to continue to fight to annihilate Israel and Jews, while consigning Palestinians to the continued brutal rule of terrorists. Imagine the sort of conscience that mistakes bolstering a murderous regime for virtue.

The legislators, exercising their copyright on conscience, limit their ceasefire call to “the assault in Gaza.” Their letter does not condemn the more than 12,000 rockets Hamas has fired on Israel since October 7th or the tens of thousands of Israelis evacuated from their homes near the democratic nation’s northern border because of rockets fired by Hezbollah, another Iran-backed terror organization.

The way forward is not hard to identify. “The central cause of Gaza’s misery is Hamas. It alone bears the blame for the suffering it has inflicted on Israel and knowingly invited against Palestinians,” wrote Bret Stephens in The New York Times on October 15th. “The best way to end the misery is to remove the cause, not stay the hand of the remover.”

David Brooks confirmed that reality five months later in a widely read March 24th extended column, also in The New York Times. There will be more misery on both sides as long as Hamas, with hundreds of miles of tunnels from which to emerge to fight and then retreat to, continues to place Palestinian civilians between itself and the IDF.

“Israel and the Palestinians have both just suffered shattering defeats. Maybe in the next few years they will do some difficult rethinking, and a new vision of the future will come into view,” Brooks concludes. “But that can happen only after Hamas is fully defeated as a military and governing force.”

The unconditional release of Hamas fighters from captivity in Israel would, as the Connecticut Democratic legislators might euphemistically describe it, extend and continue to connect the barbarous to “a history of conflict.”

Published March 30, 2024.