Their detractors will have trouble picking a side. Former partners in The Vinci Group, LLC, Democratic campaign consultants, are embroiled in litigation. State Representative Geoffrey Luxemburg (D-Manchester) claims in a six-count complaint that one-time business partner Michael Farina has failed to pay him as much as $150,000 plus 15% of other profits pursuant to the terms of their 2017 separation agreement.

Luxenburg left the business in 2017 to go to work for former political consulting client and Middletown mayor, Dan Drew. Luxwnburg lasted only three months as Drew’s chief of staff, coming to grief over the mixture of official duties and political acts. Drew was candidate for governor in 2017.

Luxenberg reclaimed a seat in the legislature in 2018 when his former wife, popular Democrat Kelly Juleson-Scopino, decided not to seek a third term from the district Luxenberg had previously represented. Luxenberg’s suit claims Farina dissolved Vinci and carried on its political and marketing work under a new entity, breaching, among other things, their agreement and an implied obligation to deal fairly with Luxenberg.

The matter has been fast-tracked for a December trial in Superior Court after Luxenberg withdrew his attempt to have the court place liens on three properties the warring business partners had owned together.

The controversy over legislation regulating Tweed-New Haven Airport continues. In a letter to Senate Republican Leader Len Fasano, the first-term attorney general declines to recuse himself from handling the matter despite his close ties to beleaguered New Haven Mayor Toni Harp. Fasano and Senate President Martin Looney have urged Tong’s office to appeal a 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals decision striking down a statute limiting the length of a runway at the airport.

Tong’s August 1st letter to Fasano suggests he is willing to mediate the dispute. A mediator usually has not taken a side in a controversy, which Tong appears to have done.

It’s fluid. There is an opening for a federal district court judge in Connecticut and one for the 2nd Circuit for a traditionally Connecticut seat. One name that has been mentioned for both is Bill Nardini, a highly regarded lawyer in the U.S. attorney’s office. He has deep roots in the state and a sterling reputation as a lawyer.

Nardini wrote about his life as a lawyer in a career guide for Yale students. His contribution is posted above and reveals why he is respected by a broad spectrum of lawyers.

Those must have been four fascinating years in Italy.

Governor Ned Lamont will provide 3.5% annual raises to a slew of non-union state employees. The raises will be retroactive to July 1st.

Tab: $4 million.

When is the last time the state’s economy grew by 3.5% in a year?

A May 14th Daily Ructions post on the suspension of State Police Lieutenant Arthur Goodale has prompted a formal internal affairs investigation. On Friday, I received an email, posted above, requesting that I reveal a source. I rejected that request without delay.

I do not reveal the identity of sources and that will not change.

New York lawyer Joseph DeMarco is on a shortlist for a Connecticut vacancy on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. DeMarco practices law in New York and has owned residential real estate in both New York and Greenwich, Connecticut.

DeMarco possesses only gossamer ties to Connecticut’s legal community. He was admitted to practice in the Constitution State in 2017, indicating he had an eye on a court appointment in the aftermath of Donald Trump’s 2016 upset victory. The Second Circuit opening was created by the retirement of Judge Christopher Droney, a popular Connecticut native. If DeMarco were to replace Droney, there would be just two of the thirteen judges on the influential court from Connecticut judges, Judge Jose Cabranes and Judge Susan Carney.

DeMarco is a favorite of the conservative Federalist Society, which appears willing to snatch a seat away from Connecticut to insert an ideologically acceptable New Yorker onto the court. DeMarco appears to have no law office in Connecticut.

The Second Circuit is comprised of Connecticut, New York and Vermont.

Senate Minority Leader Len Fasano (R-North Haven) has asked Attorney General Willian Tong to recuse himself from litigation over the proposed expansion of Tweed-New Haven airport. Fasano cites Tong’s close political ties with embattled Mayor Toni Harp as reasons the Stamford Democrat will be unable to make a fair-minded, merit-based assessment of the way forward in litigation over a state statute that limits the length of a Tweed runway

Fasano and Senate Pro Tem President Martin Looney (D-New Haven) have been working together in their opposition to the airport expansion. Looney is not a signatory on the letter.

It’s over. The legislature will not attempt to override Governor Ned Lamont’s veto of a job’s bill that extinguished the rights of some restaurant employees.

The bipartisan bill ran into trouble with a late addition that would have addressed a bifurcated wage schedule for service employees who perform other tasks. That section has not been the subject of a public hearing or meaningful debate during the long session. The controversy is the subject of litigation. Lamont objected to the legislature intervening in the pending matter.

Vote counters determined by the weekend that there were not 2/3 majorities in both chambers to override Lamont’s veto.

One hundred degrees of determination. On the wings of a strong showing at Thursday’s New Haven Democratic nominating convention, mayoral hopeful Justin Elicker’s campaign is collecting signatures for a September 10th challenge against incumbent Mayor Toni Harp.

Harp is seeking a fourth two-year term as her administration is buffeted by a federal criminal investigation. Primary voters and others can expect to hear details of the promiscuous use of a city credit card.

State Senator Alexandra Bergstein’s war on privilege and patriarchy is being met with resistance. The battle of the Bergsteins is proving an inhospitable field of conflict for the wealthy Greenwich Democrat.

Alexandra Bergstein’s incendiary response to Seth Bergstein’s motion for contempt has been vigorously contested by Seth Bergstein in a July 10th court filing. Alexandra Bergstein contends that living conditions at the couple’s Greenwich mansion hostile and unsafe, requiring her to flee the marital home. Seth Bergstein contends they were not. Rather, Alexandra “rented a separate apartment where her girlfriend now stays with her five or six nights per week.”

Seth Bergstein takes a different view of the history of the marriage. Alexandra Bergstein told the court that her marriage was meaningless in its last 15 years. Seth Bergstein dissents by alleging he returned home from a family vacation in 2010 and discovered Alexandra Bergstein in an affair with a woman. That affair, he claims, began in 2008.

Seth Bergstein also disputes Alexandra Bergstein’s claim that he took $20,000 from the family safe. He claims, “The defendant did not remove $20,000 in cash from the safe. The cash that had been in the safe was spent by the parties through the year and during Christmas vacation, as was their custom. The plaintiff’s withdrawal of $5,000 in cash was yet another violation of the [Court’s] automatic orders.“