PURA cleanup in aisle 1193. Energy bill is an admission of agency ignoring statutes.

“Any matter coming before the authority may be assigned by the chairperson to [a panel of three] one or more utility commissioners.”

It is not the usual place to discover an admission against interest in high stakes litigation, but there it is in Raised Bill 1193 from the General Assembly’s energy committee. The committee bill, An Act Concerning the Composition of the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA), seeks to fix the mess that the husbanding of authority in its chair has caused ratepayers and utilities.

The issue of dockets decided by one member of PURA is the subject of litigation brought by utilities Eversource and Avangrid. If a court adopts the plain meaning of the law, PURA will suffer a humiliating loss. Raised Bill 1193 suggests PURA chair Marissa Gillett and her dwindling number of friends at the legislature have blotted their copy by seeking to make the plaintiffs’ point for them. And if once is not enough, a second bill, 1194, does the same.

If one member of PURA had the authority to make decisions, there would be no need for 1193. But there it is: headed for public hearing tomorrow, February 4th.

The lawsuit was dismissed by state Senator Norm Needleman (D-Essex), Senate co-chair of the energy committee, as “frivolous.” This is reckless and beneath the dignity of Needleman. Plaintiff lawyers Thomas J. Murphy and James J. Healey are widely recognized as among the state’s most talented. If anyone needs proof of this consensus, read the transcripts of Healey deposing a Department of Public Health official in the grim Stone Academy litigation.

Published February 3, 2025.